In one corner, weighing in with 750 million users (most of which are actively posting about the new version of the home page today), we have Facebook. In another corner, with 25 million users (as of early August), we have Google+, which also has users who are expressing frustration at Facebook’s new changes. Both have unveiled new features this week, perhaps intended as blows toward the other. But who will come out on top as the King of the Updates?

Let’s start with Facebook. As I’m sure you’ve already discovered today, Facebook has unveiled its new news feed feature. It prominently displays your friends’ photos on the home page and attempts to place the stories it believes you will find most relevant at the top of your news feed. Also new to the home page is a scrolling update bar that takes Facebook stalking to a whole new level. Now instead of just seeing what information your friends are posting on each other’s walls, you can see everything your friends are doing while on Facebook, even if they are posting on pages you aren’t fans of or interacting with other users you aren’t friends with. 

Why, Facebook, why?

I don’t need to be aware of every single movement someone is making. Seriously, Facebook: Stop it.


(Oddly enough, found this gem on Facebook.)

Another change Facebook made is enabling users to easily assign their friends into predefined lists, while also letting them create their own friend groups so users can control who receives certain information. Sound familiar? It’s because Google+ thought of the concept first, only it called them “circles.” Facebook also allows users to subscribe to people who make their posts public, like celebrities and public figures. Again, remind you of anything?

While I know Google+ is still in its infancy, doesn’t it seem like Facebook is shaking in its boots a little here? Clearly it realizes the advantages Google+ offers, and it doesn’t want to be left behind. If you can’t beat them, join them – only in a slightly less efficient way?

But Facebook isn’t the only one making big moves this week. Google+ made its own changes, the most important of which is that the service is now open to the public. Anyone been on Google’s home page today? If you did, you probably saw this:


Yup, Google is finally allowing anyone access to its social platform. Will this help boost the number of users? Guess we’ll have to just wait and see, but I don’t think it’s a coincidence Google+ decided to make its services open to the public the same week Facebook is making major updates. (Apparently Facebook is set to unveil a major profile redesign at its f8 developer conference

Another improvement to Google+ is users can finally search within Google+ for topics or users. Yes, that’s a new feature. Why a company that is well known for its search capabilities didn’t include this feature to begin with is beyond me.

 

So what do you think of the new changes to Facebook and Google+? Who had the better updates?

Ranting & Raving is brought to you by 352 Media Group, an award-winning Web design company, Web application development firm and internet marketing agency.
More posts about Social Media
More posts by Amy - Marketing

Comments

Kim White says:

Date: 9/21/2011 4:28:17 PM #

FB's next move: it will post comments on your wall it thinks you might want to say to the people it thinks you would want to say it to.

by Kim White United States
Michelle says:

Date: 9/21/2011 4:34:28 PM #

There comes a point when personalizing something to a user makes it too cumbersome to actually use. For the user with perhaps only 100 or less Facebook "friends", the list-based update notifications simply create clutter on the page. Although I have resisted Google+ for a little while now, the clean lines of the site are really starting to call to me, while Facebook's new interface has me feeling overwhelmed and irritated.

by Michelle United States
TD says:

Date: 9/21/2011 5:42:33 PM #

Facebook just went from borderline stalker to full stalker. Never go full stalker.

By the way, good writing Amy.

by TD United States
Geoff says:

Date: 9/22/2011 12:29:59 AM #

Is it just me, or did Facebook veer more in the direction of Twitter and Google+ with this update?  They now seem to be going for quantity over quality, by focusing more on what's recent rather than what's actually good and relevant.

by Geoff United States
Brian Keller says:

Date: 9/22/2011 2:45:01 AM #

I agree with most of what you said, but I think it's a bit short sighted to suggest that Facebook is copying Google here. Google+ wouldn't even exist if it wasn't for Facebook's success. The fact is that Facebook is garnering much more viewing time per user than Google ever had, and Google is desperately trying to reinvent itself to try to capture some of that potential ad revenue. Frankly, I'm sticking with Facebook.

PS: Your comment interface doesn't seem to work in IE9. Please fix it.

by Brian Keller United States

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)
  Country flag

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading